Hi Jarkko, I was revisiting old mails, and found this thread that seems unresolved. Do you still have the page around and want to send it? Cheers, Alex On 2/20/22 21:05, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 09:19:54PM +0100, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote: >> Hi Jarkko, >> >> On 1/28/22 02:19, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 02:50:56AM +0100, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote: >>>> Hi Jarkko, >>>> >>>> Please see some comments below. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Alex >>> >>> Thank you. I've addressed all the comments below. However, I feel that >>> /dev/sgx_provision is not properly documented at all. I also think that >>> Reinette's argument for v10 was fair that "remove VEPC" ioctl that QEMU >>> uses should not be left out from the initial patch set. >>> >>> I'm implementing user space that doest attestation, so I rather write a >>> proper description of the attestation, once it is working, rather than add >>> to the number of review rounds. >> >> Fair enough. Please send an v12 with those comments addressed, and I'll >> merge it! (if you miss anything, we'll fix it later, don't worry) > > It took me two weeks to do the remote attestation implementation for Enarx > project [*] but I needed to do it before continuing with the man page. I'll > continue with this some time next week. It's not exactly directly attached > to kernel API but I think it is good to bring some context on that. > > [*] https://github.com/enarx/enarx/pull/1329 > > BR, Jarkko -- <http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/> GPG key fingerprint: A9348594CE31283A826FBDD8D57633D441E25BB5
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
