On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 11:35:10AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > Jarkko, Kai and Haitao, > > Can you three please start trimming your replies? You don't need to and > should not quote the entirety of your messages every time you reply. > > On 8/31/22 11:28, jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> Will it cause racing if we expose dev nodes to user space before > >> ksgxd is started and sensitization done? > > I'll to explain this. > > > > So the point is to fix the issue at hand, and fix it locally. > > > > Changing initialization order is simply out of context. It's > > not really an argument for or against changing it > > > > We are fixing sanitization here, and only that with zero > > side-effects to any other semantics. > > > > It's dictated by the development process [*] but more > > importantly it's also just plain common sense. > > Kai, I think your suggestion is reasonable. You make a good point about > not needing ksgxd for vepc. > > *But*, I think it's a bit too much for a bugfix that's headed to > -stable. I'm concerned that it will have unintended side effects, > *especially* when there's a working, tested alternative. Yeah, I also actually *do* agree that the suggestions could be reasonable. BR, Jarkko
