Jarkko, Kai and Haitao, Can you three please start trimming your replies? You don't need to and should not quote the entirety of your messages every time you reply. On 8/31/22 11:28, jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> Will it cause racing if we expose dev nodes to user space before >> ksgxd is started and sensitization done? > I'll to explain this. > > So the point is to fix the issue at hand, and fix it locally. > > Changing initialization order is simply out of context. It's > not really an argument for or against changing it > > We are fixing sanitization here, and only that with zero > side-effects to any other semantics. > > It's dictated by the development process [*] but more > importantly it's also just plain common sense. Kai, I think your suggestion is reasonable. You make a good point about not needing ksgxd for vepc. *But*, I think it's a bit too much for a bugfix that's headed to -stable. I'm concerned that it will have unintended side effects, *especially* when there's a working, tested alternative.
