On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 03:55:43PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 1/14/22 3:52 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > >> I can understand your hesitation, but I agree with Dave here that > >> wrapping the function makes the code more clear. I would prefer to keep > >> this the way it is. > > What if sgx_encl_get_backing() was changed as "static inline", if the > > only motivation is encapsulation? > > What would the purpose be of adding an 'inline' to the function definition? Agreed, not much sense to do this. I just had troubles to get the way things were encapsulated before your response. /Jarkko
