On 1/14/22 3:52 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: >> I can understand your hesitation, but I agree with Dave here that >> wrapping the function makes the code more clear. I would prefer to keep >> this the way it is. > What if sgx_encl_get_backing() was changed as "static inline", if the > only motivation is encapsulation? What would the purpose be of adding an 'inline' to the function definition?
