On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 09:43:38AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 12/11/21 12:02 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Mon, 2021-12-06 at 13:48 -0800, Reinette Chatre wrote: > >>> I'd suggest to change this as SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_MODIFY_TYPE. > >> How about SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_MOD_TYPE to be consistent with your earlier > >> suggestion of SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_MOD_PROTECTIONS ? > > I think it would be best to introduce only one new ioctl that would > > be capable of doing either operation (and use secinfo as a vessel > > for additional data). > > Why? > > I don't think we should try to multiplex within an ioctl(). Just create > a second ioctl(). I'm fine with 2 ioctls. /Jarkko
