On Mon, 2021-12-06 at 13:48 -0800, Reinette Chatre wrote: > > I'd suggest to change this as SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_MODIFY_TYPE. > > How about SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_MOD_TYPE to be consistent with your earlier > suggestion of SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_MOD_PROTECTIONS ? I think it would be best to introduce only one new ioctl that would be capable of doing either operation (and use secinfo as a vessel for additional data). /Jarkko
