Re: sgx_reclaimer_write() refinement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 10:08:09PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> It would greatly reduce the complexity of the flow. Would be much easier
> to do fallback code paths. We have three trial EWB approach, which
> should prevent already unnecesaary ETRACK's and IPI's.

I recall that I used a cluster ages ago to do minimize ETRACK's and
IPI's. I implemented three trial EWB during the Spring 2018 when the
reclaimer code was heavily refined but failed to notice that it rendered
cluster's meaningless...

/Jarkko



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux