On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 08:23:42AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 06:14:39PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 12:48:45PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > > A reserved field could prove useful in the future, and packed structs > > > can result in inefficiencies due to its impact on alignment. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Rather should extend mrmask just to 32 bits. > > I considered that option, but extending mrmask would probably confusing > to userspace, e.g. we'd have to document that bits 31:15 are ignored. I meant u64. Not a big deal. With the reserved field we would have to document the same in different terms. /Jarkko
