Re: [PATCH v19 16/27] x86/sgx: Add the Linux SGX Enclave Driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 6:19 AM Jarkko Sakkinen
<jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 01:06:11PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > I agree with all of the above, but unfortunately blacklisting is really
> > the only benefit that would be realized by modularizing the driver.  The
> > "driver" at this point is just the device and its ioctls, the meat of
> > the functionality has been moved into the subsystem proper.  And the few
> > remaining tidbits of functionality, e.g. sgx_encl_page_alloc() and
> > sgx_encl_alloc(), probably should be moved out of ioctl.c as well.
>
> That is kind of core reason of having an LKM here, to wrap the uapi. It
> is not about reducing size of the kernel. It is about ability to tailor
> the uapi on stock kernels.
>

As I see it, there is really only one significant benefit of modules:
reducing the size of the kernel in the case that the module isn't
loaded.  (And organizing module parameters, I suppose, but you don't,
strictly speaking, need to be able to build as a module to do that.)
SGX can be blacklisted by booting with nosgx (or, if if can't, then
that should be added).

--Andy



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux