> On Nov 19, 2018, at 10:19 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 04:22:54PM +0000, Jethro Beekman wrote: >>> On 2018-11-19 20:36, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: >>> Question: should be dissolve the driver completely and move this code to >>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ (and rename intel_sgx.c as main.c)? Swapping >>> patch removes the possibility to compile this as a module anyway. >> >> No. We should keep the capability to build this as a module for other users >> of SGX. What is the swapping patch and why doesn't allow building as a >> module? > > In some earlier version of the patch set the request was to remove the > callback interface to the driver so now core does direct calls to the > swapping operations. > > Once static_call lands, this will be a great use for it.
