On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 02:02:25PM +0100, Andre Werner wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2025, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 08:30:30AM +0100, Andre Werner wrote:
...
> > > +static void sc16is7xx_poll_proc(struct kthread_work *ws)
> > > +{
> > > + struct sc16is7xx_port *s = container_of(ws, struct sc16is7xx_port, poll_work.work);
> > > +
> > > + /* Reuse standard IRQ handler. Interrupt ID is unused in this context. */
> >
> > Period.
>
> What do you expect here? Shall I add the period time from the define as
> the dedicated value? I do not understand what I should add here in
> detail.
>
> >
> > > + /* Setup delay based on SC16IS7XX_POLL_PERIOD_MS */
> >
> > No period.
>
> Or do you mean that I add the define only once and not add all used
> places?
...
> > Please, go through the comments you added in the patch and use the style that
> > is mostly used in the driver for the similar (one-line comment) situations.
^^^ Read this. You have added three comments in two different styles.
It's not a big or anyhow critical issue in this case, it's matter of
the consistency with the existing style.
I expect that all three will in the same style, preferable the one
that is currently in use in the driver for other comments.
...
> > > + /* Initialize kernel thread for polling */
> >
> > Again, no period.
>
> Same here. Do you expect the value here or the name of the used define?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
