Re: [PATCH v3 08/13] clk: at91: sama7d65: add sama7d65 pmc driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 08.12.2024 18:35, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 06/12/2024 à 20:59, Ryan.Wanner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx a écrit :
>> From: Ryan Wanner <Ryan.Wanner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Add clock support for SAMA7D65 SoC.
>>
>> Increase maximum number of valid master clocks. The PMC for the SAMA7D65
>> requires 9 master clocks.
>>
>> Increase maximum amount of PLLs to 9 to support SAMA7D65 SoC PLL
>> requirements.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Wanner <Ryan.Wanner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> ...
> 
>> +    for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sama7d65_gck); i++) {
>> +        u8 num_parents = 4 + sama7d65_gck[i].pp_count;
>> +        struct clk_hw *tmp_parent_hws[8];
>> +        u32 *mux_table;
>> +
>> +        mux_table = kmalloc_array(num_parents, sizeof(*mux_table),
>> +                      GFP_KERNEL);
>> +        if (!mux_table)
>> +            goto err_free;
>> +
>> +        PMC_INIT_TABLE(mux_table, 4);
>> +        PMC_FILL_TABLE(&mux_table[4], sama7d65_gck[i].pp_mux_table,
>> +                   sama7d65_gck[i].pp_count);
>> +        for (j = 0; j < sama7d65_gck[i].pp_count; j++) {
>> +            u8 pll_id = sama7d65_gck[i].pp[j].pll_id;
>> +            u8 pll_compid = sama7d65_gck[i].pp[j].pll_compid;
>> +
>> +            tmp_parent_hws[j] = sama7d65_plls[pll_id][pll_compid].hw;
>> +        }
>> +        PMC_FILL_TABLE(&parent_hws[4], tmp_parent_hws,
>> +                   sama7d65_gck[i].pp_count);
>> +
>> +        hw = at91_clk_register_generated(regmap, &pmc_pcr_lock,
>> +                         &sama7d65_pcr_layout,
>> +                         sama7d65_gck[i].n, NULL,
>> +                         parent_hws, mux_table,
>> +                         num_parents,
>> +                         sama7d65_gck[i].id,
>> +                         &sama7d65_gck[i].r,
>> +                         sama7d65_gck[i].pp_chg_id);
>> +        if (IS_ERR(hw))
> 
> If we fail here, mux_table is not freed, because it is not stored yet in
> alloc_mem.

You're right! I missed that.




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux