On Tue 2024-11-05 16:45:07, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote: > Hello, > > This is the second version of the patchset. It now addresses comments > from John and Petr, while also mentioning that the current work solves > one issue on handle_sysrq when the printk messages are deferred. > > The original cover-letter in is the v1. > > Please review! > > Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@xxxxxxxx> > --- > Changes in v2: > - Mentioned that it fixes a bug related to loglevel= dance (suggested by John) > - Changed to loud_con to FORCE_CON (John, Petr) > - Don't skip printk delay if FORCE_CON is specified (John) > - Set FORCE_CON when LOG_CONT is handled (John) > - Changed force_con from a per-CPU variable to a global variable because > we can't disable migration on the callsites. (John, Petr) > - Used is_printk_force_console() on boot_delay_msec(), since it's used > when the message is stored, instead of setting is as an argument. > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241016-printk-loud-con-v1-0-065e4dad6632@xxxxxxxx > --- > Marcos Paulo de Souza (2): > printk: Introduce FORCE_CON flag > tty: sysrq: Use printk_force_console context on __handle_sysrq The patchset looks ready for linux-next from my POV. I am going to push it there tomorrow or on Monday unless anyone complains. There was some bike-shedding about the code style in the reviews. But the proposals did not look like a big win. I think that it is not worth a respin. Best Regards, Petr
