Hi Marcos, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on 1d227fcc72223cbdd34d0ce13541cbaab5e0d72f] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Marcos-Paulo-de-Souza/printk-Introduce-LOUD_CON-flag/20241017-010521 base: 1d227fcc72223cbdd34d0ce13541cbaab5e0d72f patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241016-printk-loud-con-v1-2-065e4dad6632%40suse.com patch subject: [PATCH 2/2] tty: sysrq: Use printk_loud_console context on __handle_sysrq config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-004-20241018 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241018/202410181116.WA27FpBB-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241018/202410181116.WA27FpBB-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410181116.WA27FpBB-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/tty/sysrq.c: In function '__handle_sysrq': >> drivers/tty/sysrq.c:600:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'printk_loud_console_enter' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 600 | printk_loud_console_enter(); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/tty/sysrq.c:610:25: error: implicit declaration of function 'printk_loud_console_exit' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 610 | printk_loud_console_exit(); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +/printk_loud_console_enter +600 drivers/tty/sysrq.c 582 583 void __handle_sysrq(u8 key, bool check_mask) 584 { 585 const struct sysrq_key_op *op_p; 586 int orig_suppress_printk; 587 int i; 588 589 orig_suppress_printk = suppress_printk; 590 suppress_printk = 0; 591 592 rcu_sysrq_start(); 593 rcu_read_lock(); 594 /* 595 * Enter in the console_loud context so that sysrq header is shown to 596 * provide the user with positive feedback. We do not simply emit this 597 * at KERN_EMERG as that would change message routing in the consumers 598 * of /proc/kmsg. 599 */ > 600 printk_loud_console_enter(); 601 602 op_p = __sysrq_get_key_op(key); 603 if (op_p) { 604 /* 605 * Should we check for enabled operations (/proc/sysrq-trigger 606 * should not) and is the invoked operation enabled? 607 */ 608 if (!check_mask || sysrq_on_mask(op_p->enable_mask)) { 609 pr_info("%s\n", op_p->action_msg); > 610 printk_loud_console_exit(); 611 op_p->handler(key); 612 } else { 613 pr_info("This sysrq operation is disabled.\n"); 614 printk_loud_console_exit(); 615 } 616 } else { 617 pr_info("HELP : "); 618 /* Only print the help msg once per handler */ 619 for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sysrq_key_table); i++) { 620 if (sysrq_key_table[i]) { 621 int j; 622 623 for (j = 0; sysrq_key_table[i] != 624 sysrq_key_table[j]; j++) 625 ; 626 if (j != i) 627 continue; 628 pr_cont("%s ", sysrq_key_table[i]->help_msg); 629 } 630 } 631 pr_cont("\n"); 632 printk_loud_console_exit(); 633 } 634 rcu_read_unlock(); 635 rcu_sysrq_end(); 636 637 suppress_printk = orig_suppress_printk; 638 } 639 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki