From: Parker Newman <pnewman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Use the BIT() macro rather than (1 << (i - 1)). Signed-off-by: Parker Newman <pnewman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/misc/eeprom/eeprom_93cx6.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/eeprom_93cx6.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/eeprom_93cx6.c index 4c9827fe9217..e6f0e0fc1ca2 100644 --- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/eeprom_93cx6.c +++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/eeprom_93cx6.c @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ * Supported chipsets: 93c46 & 93c66. */ +#include <linux/bits.h> #include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/delay.h> @@ -102,7 +103,7 @@ static void eeprom_93cx6_write_bits(struct eeprom_93cx6 *eeprom, /* * Check if this bit needs to be set. */ - eeprom->reg_data_in = !!(data & (1 << (i - 1))); + eeprom->reg_data_in = !!(data & BIT(i - 1)); /* * Write the bit to the eeprom register. @@ -152,7 +153,7 @@ static void eeprom_93cx6_read_bits(struct eeprom_93cx6 *eeprom, * Read if the bit has been set. */ if (eeprom->reg_data_out) - buf |= (1 << (i - 1)); + buf |= BIT(i - 1); eeprom_93cx6_pulse_low(eeprom); } -- 2.46.0
