Am Dienstag, 13. August 2024, 18:38:58 CEST schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> On 04/08/2024 16:05, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 04/08/2024 15:20, Yao Zi wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> >>>> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> >>>> + clock-frequency = <24000000>;
> >>>> + clock-output-names = "xin24m";
> >>>> + };
> >>>> +
> >>>> + gic: interrupt-controller@fed01000 {
> >>>
> >>> Why this all is outside of SoC?
> >>
> >> Just as Heiko says, device tree for all other Rockchip SoCs don't have
> >> a "soc" node. I didn't know why before but just follow the style.
> >>
> >> If you prefer add a soc node, I am willing to.
> >
> > Surprising as usually we expect MMIO nodes being part of SoC to be under
> > soc@, but if that's Rockchip preference then fine.
>
> One more comment, I forgot we actually have it documented long time ago:
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.11-rc1/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst#L90
I guess that piece of documentation should move to the dts style
guide though? Because it's not about writing bindings but how
to structure a dts/dtsi.
