On Sun, Aug 04, 2024 at 04:05:24PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 04/08/2024 15:20, Yao Zi wrote:
> >>
> >>> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> >>> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> >>> + clock-frequency = <24000000>;
> >>> + clock-output-names = "xin24m";
> >>> + };
> >>> +
> >>> + gic: interrupt-controller@fed01000 {
> >>
> >> Why this all is outside of SoC?
> >
> > Just as Heiko says, device tree for all other Rockchip SoCs don't have
> > a "soc" node. I didn't know why before but just follow the style.
> >
> > If you prefer add a soc node, I am willing to.
>
> Surprising as usually we expect MMIO nodes being part of SoC to be under
> soc@, but if that's Rockchip preference then fine.
>
Okay, then I would leave it as is.
For the fixed-clock node, I think "xin24m: clock-24m { }" is okay and
follows the new rule?
Best regards,
Yao Zi
