On 05/06/2024 09:52, Kwanghoon Son wrote: > On 6/5/24 3:42 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> But that's not true. We do not write there more than 15, including >> terminating NULL byte, right? > > For now, right. only clk_uart_baud[0-3] acceptable. > > I thought this meaningful in code side, clk_num u8 can over in future. But it can't now. > Also don't want to see warnings. > > But if It's false warning(device tree constrain), please ignore patch. To me the warning is a false positive. Best regards, Krzysztof
