Hi Greg, On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 1:06 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 09:42:50AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 07:15:23AM +0100, Lad, Prabhakar wrote: > > > Hi Greg, > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 2:45 PM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > This patch series updates DT binding doc and scif driver to add support > > > > for the Renesas RZ/V2H(P) SoC. RZ/V2H(P) SoC supports one channel SCIF > > > > interface. > > > > > > > > v3->v4 > > > > - patch 2/4 reverted back to version 2 > > > > - new patch 3/5 added > > > > - Added new reg type for RZ/V2H > > > > > > > > v2->v3 > > > > - Included DT validation patches > > > > - Added a new compat string for RZ/V2H(P) SoC > > > > - Added driver changes for RZ/V2H(P) SoC > > > > - Listed interrupts and interrupt-names for every SoC in if check > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Prabhakar > > > > > > > > Lad Prabhakar (5): > > > > dt-bindings: serial: renesas,scif: Move ref for serial.yaml at the end > > > > dt-bindings: serial: renesas,scif: Validate 'interrupts' and > > > > 'interrupt-names' > > > > dt-bindings: serial: renesas,scif: Make 'interrupt-names' property as > > > > required > > > > dt-bindings: serial: Add documentation for Renesas RZ/V2H(P) > > > > (R9A09G057) SCIF support > > > > serial: sh-sci: Add support for RZ/V2H(P) SoC > > > > > > > Gentle ping. > > > > It is only 3 days since the merge window ended, please be patient for > > maintainers to catch up with their pending review queue. Especially for > > non-bugfixes like these that will be included in the 6.11-rc1 release, > > there is not any rush here for anyone just yet. > > > > For example, my todo queue currently has 1458 emails to process in it, > > this thread is somewhere in the middle. > > > > In the meantime, please help review other pending patches for the > > subsystem to help enable your patches to move toward the top of the > > queue. > > And this patch series does not even apply, so how could it be accepted? > Oops I'll rebase the changes now. > Please fix and resend with the proper reviews added. > Sure will do. Cheers, Prabhakar
