On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 04:25:40PM -0400, parker@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Parker Newman <pnewman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> - Adds support for reading a word from the Exar EEPROM.
> - Adds exar_write_reg/exar_read_reg for reading and writing to the UART's
> config registers.
First off, thanks for splitting this up, looks much better.
Some minor nits here:
>
> Signed-off-by: Parker Newman <pnewman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_exar.c | 110 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 110 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_exar.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_exar.c
> index 4d1e07343d0b..49d690344e65 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_exar.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_exar.c
> @@ -128,6 +128,16 @@
> #define UART_EXAR_DLD 0x02 /* Divisor Fractional */
> #define UART_EXAR_DLD_485_POLARITY 0x80 /* RS-485 Enable Signal Polarity */
>
> +/* EEPROM registers */
> +#define UART_EXAR_REGB 0x8e
> +#define UART_EXAR_REGB_EECK BIT(4)
> +#define UART_EXAR_REGB_EECS BIT(5)
> +#define UART_EXAR_REGB_EEDI BIT(6)
> +#define UART_EXAR_REGB_EEDO BIT(7)
> +#define UART_EXAR_REGB_EE_ADDR_SIZE 6
> +#define UART_EXAR_REGB_EE_DATA_SIZE 16
Use tabs after the define name and before the value?
> +
> +
> /*
> * IOT2040 MPIO wiring semantics:
> *
> @@ -195,6 +205,106 @@ struct exar8250 {
> int line[];
> };
>
> +static inline void exar_write_reg(struct exar8250 *priv,
> + unsigned int reg, uint8_t value)
> +{
> + if (!priv || !priv->virt)
> + return;
> +
> + writeb(value, priv->virt + reg);
> +}
> +
> +static inline uint8_t exar_read_reg(struct exar8250 *priv, unsigned int reg)
> +{
> + if (!priv || !priv->virt)
> + return 0;
How can either of these ever happen? You control when this is called,
right? So just make sure that isn't an issue.
> +
> + return readb(priv->virt + reg);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void exar_ee_select(struct exar8250 *priv, bool enable)
> +{
> + uint8_t value = 0x00;
This is the kernel, please use kernel types, not userspace types (i.e.
u8 not uint8_t). Yes, there are lots of places in the kernel that have
userspace types, but let's not add to the mess please.
> +
> + if (enable)
> + value |= UART_EXAR_REGB_EECS;
> +
> + exar_write_reg(priv, UART_EXAR_REGB, value);
> + udelay(2);
Why wait this amount of time? A comment would be nice. Why not just
do a read to ensure the write happened instead?
> +}
> +
> +static inline void exar_ee_write_bit(struct exar8250 *priv, int bit)
> +{
> + uint8_t value = UART_EXAR_REGB_EECS;
Same comment about the type, here and everywhere else.
> +
> + if (bit)
> + value |= UART_EXAR_REGB_EEDI;
> +
> + //Clock out the bit on the i2c interface
Comments using // are fine, but please put a space after the "//" to
make them readable
> + exar_write_reg(priv, UART_EXAR_REGB, value);
> + udelay(2);
Same commment about the time value, here and everywhere else. Why slow
things down if you don't have to?
thanks,
greg k-h
