On 21/03/2024 16:41, Wadim Mueller wrote: > Add a compatible string for the SDHC binding of NXP S32G3 platforms. Here > we use "nxp,s32g2-usdhc" as fallback since the s32g2-usdhc > driver works also on S32G3 platforms. > > Signed-off-by: Wadim Mueller <wafgo01@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml > index 82eb7a24c857..b42b4368fa4e 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ properties: > - fsl,imx8mm-usdhc > - fsl,imxrt1050-usdhc > - nxp,s32g2-usdhc > + - nxp,s32g3-usdhc > - items: > - const: fsl,imx50-esdhc > - const: fsl,imx53-esdhc > @@ -90,6 +91,9 @@ properties: > - enum: > - fsl,imxrt1170-usdhc > - const: fsl,imxrt1050-usdhc > + - items: > + - const: nxp,s32g3-usdhc > + - const: nxp,s32g2-usdhc No, that's just wrong. G3 is not and is compatible with G2? There is no dualism here. Either it is or it is not. Not both. Best regards, Krzysztof
