Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: serial: renesas,scif: Validate 'interrupts' and 'interrupt-names'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Krzysztof,

Thank you for the review.

On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 1:50 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 07/03/2024 12:42, Prabhakar wrote:
> > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > This commit adds support to validate the 'interrupts' and 'interrupt-names'
>
> Please do not use "This commit/patch/change", but imperative mood. See
> longer explanation here:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17.1/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L95
>
Sure, I will update the description.

> > properties for every supported SoC. This ensures proper handling and
> > configuration of interrupt-related properties across supported platforms.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > v1->v2
> > * Defined the properties in top-level block instead of moving into
> >   if/else block for each SoC.
> > * Used Gen specific callback strings instead of each SoC variant
>
> You are sending quite a lot of patchsets touching the same, all in one
> day. This just adds to the confusion.
>
Ok, I'll make it as a single series.

> > ---
> >  .../bindings/serial/renesas,scif.yaml         | 90 +++++++++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/renesas,scif.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/renesas,scif.yaml
> > index af72c3420453..6ba6b6d52208 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/renesas,scif.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/renesas,scif.yaml
> > @@ -83,36 +83,24 @@ properties:
> >      maxItems: 1
> >
> >    interrupts:
> > -    oneOf:
> > -      - items:
> > -          - description: A combined interrupt
> > -      - items:
> > -          - description: Error interrupt
> > -          - description: Receive buffer full interrupt
> > -          - description: Transmit buffer empty interrupt
> > -          - description: Break interrupt
> > -      - items:
> > -          - description: Error interrupt
> > -          - description: Receive buffer full interrupt
> > -          - description: Transmit buffer empty interrupt
> > -          - description: Break interrupt
> > -          - description: Data Ready interrupt
> > -          - description: Transmit End interrupt
> > +    minItems: 1
> > +    items:
> > +      - description: Error interrupt or single combined interrupt
>
> That's not correct, your first interrupt can be combined.
>
In here we are combining and making a single list hence the
description is updated as "Error interrupt or single combined
interrupt". so that we dont have to list the items in the below
if/else checks. Also when the interrupts are combined we dont specify
interrupt-names hence in the below check we  set "interrupt-names:
false"

> > +      - description: Receive buffer full interrupt
> > +      - description: Transmit buffer empty interrupt
> > +      - description: Break interrupt
> > +      - description: Data Ready interrupt
> > +      - description: Transmit End interrupt
> >
> >    interrupt-names:
> > -    oneOf:
> > -      - items:
> > -          - const: eri
> > -          - const: rxi
> > -          - const: txi
> > -          - const: bri
> > -      - items:
> > -          - const: eri
> > -          - const: rxi
> > -          - const: txi
> > -          - const: bri
> > -          - const: dri
> > -          - const: tei
> > +    minItems: 4
> > +    items:
> > +      - const: eri
> > +      - const: rxi
> > +      - const: txi
> > +      - const: bri
> > +      - const: dri
> > +      - const: tei
> >
> >    clocks:
> >      minItems: 1
> > @@ -173,6 +161,52 @@ allOf:
> >        required:
> >          - resets
> >
> > +  - if:
> > +      properties:
> > +        compatible:
> > +          contains:
> > +            enum:
> > +              - renesas,rcar-gen1-scif
> > +              - renesas,rcar-gen2-scif
> > +              - renesas,rcar-gen3-scif
> > +              - renesas,rcar-gen4-scif
> > +    then:
> > +      properties:
> > +        interrupts:
> > +          maxItems: 1
>
> You need to list the items here.
>
Shouldn't the already squashed interrupts list still be valid here?
Why do we need to list the item here (and below)? If we list items for
interrupts should we be doing the same for interrupt-names too?

Cheers,
Prabhakar

> > +
> > +        interrupt-names: false
> > +
> > +  - if:
> > +      properties:
> > +        compatible:
> > +          contains:
> > +            enum:
> > +              - renesas,scif-r7s72100
> > +    then:
> > +      properties:
> > +        interrupts:
> > +          minItems: 4
> > +          maxItems: 4
>
> List the items
>
> > +
> > +        interrupt-names:
> > +          maxItems: 4
> > +
> > +  - if:
> > +      properties:
> > +        compatible:
> > +          contains:
> > +            enum:
> > +              - renesas,scif-r7s9210
> > +              - renesas,scif-r9a07g044
> > +    then:
> > +      properties:
> > +        interrupts:
> > +          minItems: 6
>
> List the items
>
> > +
> > +        interrupt-names:
> > +          minItems: 6
> > +
> >  unevaluatedProperties: false
> >
> >  examples:
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux