On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 11:33:08AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 18. 01. 24, 10:36, Leonardo Bras wrote: > > I am using mainline (torvalds/linux) kernel, forcing ARCH_SUPPORTS_RT: > > > > diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig > > index 5ca66aad0d08..879c34398cb7 100644 > > --- a/arch/Kconfig > > +++ b/arch/Kconfig > > @@ -1195,7 +1195,7 @@ config ARCH_NO_PREEMPT > > bool > > config ARCH_SUPPORTS_RT > > - bool > > + def_bool y > > > > Since I was not aware of a PREEMPT_RT-patched tree, I did this so I could > > compile a PREEMPT_RT kernel. > > Huh, when exactly did you intend to mention this? Since I was not aware of an PREEMPT_RT-patched tree, I thought that this was the vanilla way to get a PREEMPT_RT kernel running. TBH I did not even though that there were an external repo for PREEMPT_RT. I mean, I knew about non-mainline patches in the past, but I thought everything got already merged upstream, and any other patches would be WIP. I understand this was a mistake on my part, and I feel sorry if this brought any pain to reviewers. For the future, I will be basing my RT work in this RT-devel tree shared by John. Thanks! Leo > > -- > js > suse labs >
