On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 02:18:21PM +0000, Peter Griffin wrote: > Hi Tudor, > > On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 at 12:58, Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Add dt-schema documentation for the Connectivity Peripheral 0 (PERIC0) > > clock management unit. > > > > Reviewed-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > v2: > > - fix comments as per Sam's suggestion and collect his R-b tag > > - Rob's suggestion of renaming the clock-names to just "bus" and "ip" > > was not implemented as I felt it affects readability in the driver > > and consistency with other exynos clock drivers. I will happily update > > the names in the -rc phase if someone else has a stronger opinion than > > mine. > > > > It would be good to get Krzysztof and Robs view on whether they agree > with the above rationale or whether they would still like to see the > names updated. > > Personally I like the consistency, grepability and the fact the > current name encodes whether it is a gate, divider into the name. > Seeing 'sss' or 'ip' as a clock name in the driver code doesn't tell > you a lot without having to then cross reference with the dts. > > Is there some rationale and/or benefit behind having the shorter > names? The only thing I could think of is trying to partially re-use > this file on future SoCs like gs201 which might be clocked > differently, but then these exynos clock drivers seem to be SoC > specific anyway. The point of -names is to identify one entry from another in the list. Having the name of the block is just redundant. I like consistency, but not when it's a pattern we don't want. Rob
