Re: [PATCH 01/13] dt-bindings: clock: google,gs101: fix CMU_TOP gate clock names

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 15/12/2023 20:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 15/12/2023 11:23, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>> Hi, Krzysztof,
>>
>> On 12/15/23 08:13, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 14/12/2023 11:52, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>>>> The gs101 clock names are derived from the clock register names under
>>>> some certain rules. In particular, for the gate clocks the following is
>>>> documented and expected in the gs101 clock driver:
>>>>
>>>>   Replace CLK_CON_GAT_CLKCMU      with CLK_GOUT_CMU and gout_cmu
>>>>   Replace CLK_CON_GAT_GATE_CLKCMU with CLK_GOUT_CMU and gout_cmu
>>>>
>>>>   For gates remove _UID _BLK _IPCLKPORT and _RSTNSYNC
>>>
>>> I don't understand what it has to do with the bindings.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> The CMU TOP gate clock names missed to include the required "CMU"
>>>> differentiator which will cause name collisions with the gate clock names
>>>> of other clock units. Fix the TOP gate clock names and include "CMU" in
>>>> their name.
>>>
>>> Neither here. Clock names are not related to defines.
>>>
>>
>> When saying "clock names" I meant the clock symbolic names that are
>> defined in the bindings, the _id passed in GATE(_id, ) if you want.
> 
> Please re-phrase the commit message to say that you need to rename the
> defines in the bindings headers. If you change anything else, like clock
> names, then it should be separate patch.

I forgot:
You can also respin this patch separately, as soon as possible, because
it has to go this cycle.

Best regards,
Krzysztof





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux