On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 10:47:18AM +0900, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 09:09:46AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 08:37:08AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: > > > diff --git a/drivers/gnss/serial.c b/drivers/gnss/serial.c > > > index 5d8e9bfb24d0..baa956494e79 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gnss/serial.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gnss/serial.c > > > @@ -80,8 +80,8 @@ static const struct gnss_operations gnss_serial_gnss_ops = { > > > .write_raw = gnss_serial_write_raw, > > > }; > > > > > > -static int gnss_serial_receive_buf(struct serdev_device *serdev, > > > - const unsigned char *buf, size_t count) > > > +static ssize_t gnss_serial_receive_buf(struct serdev_device *serdev, > > > + const u8 *buf, size_t count) > > The gnss subsystem consistently use tabs-only for indentation of > > continuation lines so please don't change the indentation for these > > files. > > That's going to drive checkpatch.pl crazy, please don't inist on it as > that is not going to work well over time as we would all have to > remember that just for this one subsystem :( Open-parenthesis alignment is not part of the coding standard and is hidden behind the checkpatch.pl --strict option along with other (often excessive) checks that are not generally agreed upon. Only staging and networking enable that option by default and I think checkpatch.pl handles that transparently. So this should not be an issue unless you're trying to enforce the contentious checks tree wide (i.e. just drop the --strict option). That said, as this only affects one function (the other one happened to align while still only using tabs) I can fix that up later unless Jiri is resending for some other reason. Johan