On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 6:14 AM Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 08:21:35PM +0100, Philipp Stanner wrote: > > The functions (v)memdup_user() are utilized to copy userspace arrays. > > This is done without overflow checks. > > > > Use the new wrappers memdup_array_user() and vmemdup_array_user() to > > copy the arrays more safely. > > > @@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ int con_set_unimap(struct vc_data *vc, ushort ct, struct unipair __user *list) > > if (!ct) > > return 0; > > > - unilist = vmemdup_user(list, array_size(sizeof(*unilist), ct)); > > + unilist = vmemdup_array_user(list, ct, sizeof(*unilist)); > > if (IS_ERR(unilist)) > > return PTR_ERR(unilist); > > a 16bit value times sizeof(something). So since it's already using array_size here, moving it to a new helper for consistency just makes things clearer, and so you are fine with the patch? Otherwise I'd think you are been a snarky asshole to a coworker. Dave.