Re: [PATCH v3 05/20] dt-bindings: arm: google: Add bindings for Google ARM platforms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Sam,

Thanks for the review.

On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 00:06, Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 1:49 PM Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > This introduces bindings and dt-schema for the Google tensor SoCs.
> > Currently just gs101 and pixel 6 are supported.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/google.yaml       | 46 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/google.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/google.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/google.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..167945e4d5ee
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/google.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/arm/google.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Google Tensor platforms
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > +  - Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > +
> > +description: |
> > +  ARM platforms using SoCs designed by Google branded "Tensor" used in Pixel
> > +  devices.
> > +
> > +  Currently upstream this is devices using "gs101" SoC which is found in Pixel
> > +  6, Pixel 6 Pro and Pixel 6a.
> > +
> > +  Google have a few different names for the SoC.
> > +  - Marketing name ("Tensor")
> > +  - Codename ("Whitechapel")
> > +  - SoC ID ("gs101")
> > +  - Die ID ("S5P9845");
> > +
> > +  Likewise there are a couple of names for the actual device
> > +  - Marketing name ("Pixel 6")
> > +  - Codename ("Oriole")
> > +
> > +  Devicetrees should use the lowercased SoC ID and lowercased board codename.
> > +  e.g. gs101 and gs101-oriole
> > +
> > +properties:
> > +  $nodename:
> > +    const: '/'
> > +  compatible:
> > +    oneOf:
> > +
>
> Is that empty line is actually needed here?

Will fix in v4.

Peter




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux