Hi Andy,
[...]
> - baud_mux_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "sw_baud");
> - if (IS_ERR(baud_mux_clk)) {
> - if (PTR_ERR(baud_mux_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> - ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> - goto release_dma;
> - }
> - dev_dbg(dev, "BAUD MUX clock not specified\n");
> - } else {
> + baud_mux_clk = devm_clk_get_optional_enabled(dev, "sw_baud");
> + ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(baud_mux_clk);
> + if (ret)
> + goto release_dma;
> + if (baud_mux_clk) {
> dev_dbg(dev, "BAUD MUX clock found\n");
> - ret = clk_prepare_enable(baud_mux_clk);
> - if (ret)
> - goto release_dma;
> +
> priv->baud_mux_clk = baud_mux_clk;
> init_real_clk_rates(dev, priv);
> clk_rate = priv->default_mux_rate;
> + } else {
> + dev_dbg(dev, "BAUD MUX clock not specified\n");
little behavioral change here, but I don't think this is a
problem.
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Andi
