Three of the four entries of imx_uart_devdata[] use .uts_reg = IMX21_UTS. The difference in the .devtype member isn't relevant, the only thing that matters is if is equal to IMX1_UART. So use an entry with .devtype = IMX21_UART on all platforms but i.MX1. There is no need to have the dev types in an array, so split them up in two separate variables. The fsl,imx53-uart devinfo can go away because in the binding and also the dts files all fsl,imx53-uart devices also are compatible to fsl,imx21-uart. That's not the case for fsl,imx6q-uart (which is a bit strange IMHO), so the fsl,imx6q-uart must stay around. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Hello, this diff's idea appeared already in reply to a patch by Tom Rix that became commit 7553574900f37847a25c4d572b13c512811604ed. I just found the discussion[1] while cleaning up my inbox. This is a slightly improved version. Best regards Uwe [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-serial/20230318143041.n6rymackf6p776rq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx drivers/tty/serial/imx.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c index 13cb78340709..3d429f6fa048 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c @@ -177,8 +177,6 @@ enum imx_uart_type { IMX1_UART, IMX21_UART, - IMX53_UART, - IMX6Q_UART, }; /* device type dependent stuff */ @@ -240,30 +238,26 @@ struct imx_port_ucrs { unsigned int ucr3; }; -static struct imx_uart_data imx_uart_devdata[] = { - [IMX1_UART] = { - .uts_reg = IMX1_UTS, - .devtype = IMX1_UART, - }, - [IMX21_UART] = { - .uts_reg = IMX21_UTS, - .devtype = IMX21_UART, - }, - [IMX53_UART] = { - .uts_reg = IMX21_UTS, - .devtype = IMX53_UART, - }, - [IMX6Q_UART] = { - .uts_reg = IMX21_UTS, - .devtype = IMX6Q_UART, - }, +static const struct imx_uart_data imx_uart_imx1_devdata = { + .uts_reg = IMX1_UTS, + .devtype = IMX1_UART, +}; + +static const struct imx_uart_data imx_uart_imx21_devdata = { + .uts_reg = IMX21_UTS, + .devtype = IMX21_UART, }; static const struct of_device_id imx_uart_dt_ids[] = { - { .compatible = "fsl,imx6q-uart", .data = &imx_uart_devdata[IMX6Q_UART], }, - { .compatible = "fsl,imx53-uart", .data = &imx_uart_devdata[IMX53_UART], }, - { .compatible = "fsl,imx1-uart", .data = &imx_uart_devdata[IMX1_UART], }, - { .compatible = "fsl,imx21-uart", .data = &imx_uart_devdata[IMX21_UART], }, + /* + * For reasons unknown to me, some UART devices (e.g. imx6ul's) are + * compatible to fsl,imx6q-uart, but not fsl,imx21-uart, while the + * original imx6q's UART is compatible to fsl,imx21-uart. This driver + * doesn't make any distinction between these two variants. + */ + { .compatible = "fsl,imx6q-uart", .data = &imx_uart_imx21_devdata, }, + { .compatible = "fsl,imx1-uart", .data = &imx_uart_imx1_devdata, }, + { .compatible = "fsl,imx21-uart", .data = &imx_uart_imx21_devdata, }, { /* sentinel */ } }; MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx_uart_dt_ids); base-commit: 57c2dab5596a2bd0cda64fcc208efdefe296788f -- 2.40.1
