On Mon, 21 Aug 2023, Greg KH wrote:
> ⚠Caution: External email. Exercise extreme caution with links or attachments.⚠
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 12:06:17PM -0400, Matthew Howell wrote:
> > From: Matthew Howell <matthew.howell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > These Sealevel 7xxxC IDs are no longer needed because we (Sealevel) will
> > be releasing the cards with the standard Exar hardware IDs. This is due
> > to the selected IDs causing unexpected behaviors on some Windows systems.
> >
> > Reverts: 14ee78d ("Add support for Sealevel 7xxxC serial cards")
>
> If this is a real "revert", then perhaps just do that revert instead?
I will try that if that is preferable.
> Also, as per our documentation, you need a sha1 a bit longer than that
> :)
Sorry, I thought I had seen them referenced as 7 characters in other
posts. Will fix when I resubmit.
>
> And "Reverts:" isn't a valid tag, perhaps "Fixes:"?
>
> And meta-note, your patch series was not linked together, how did you
> send them?
I used Alpine.
Sorry for the hassle...but could you clarify how they should be linked? Do
you mean I should have sent the second patch as a reply to this one?
I didn't see any specifics about patch linking in the documentation so I
am not/was not clear on the intended or 'best practice' way of linking
patches.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
