On Mon, 21 Aug 2023, Greg KH wrote: > ⚠Caution: External email. Exercise extreme caution with links or attachments.⚠ > > > On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 12:06:17PM -0400, Matthew Howell wrote: > > From: Matthew Howell <matthew.howell@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > These Sealevel 7xxxC IDs are no longer needed because we (Sealevel) will > > be releasing the cards with the standard Exar hardware IDs. This is due > > to the selected IDs causing unexpected behaviors on some Windows systems. > > > > Reverts: 14ee78d ("Add support for Sealevel 7xxxC serial cards") > > If this is a real "revert", then perhaps just do that revert instead? I will try that if that is preferable. > Also, as per our documentation, you need a sha1 a bit longer than that > :) Sorry, I thought I had seen them referenced as 7 characters in other posts. Will fix when I resubmit. > > And "Reverts:" isn't a valid tag, perhaps "Fixes:"? > > And meta-note, your patch series was not linked together, how did you > send them? I used Alpine. Sorry for the hassle...but could you clarify how they should be linked? Do you mean I should have sent the second patch as a reply to this one? I didn't see any specifics about patch linking in the documentation so I am not/was not clear on the intended or 'best practice' way of linking patches. > > thanks, > > greg k-h >