Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] serial: 8250_dw: fall back to poll if there's no interrupt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] serial: 8250_dw: fall back to poll if there's no interrupt
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2023 12:20:11 +0200
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-serial@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20230806092056.2467-1-jszhang@kernel.org>
References: <20230806092056.2467-1-jszhang@kernel.org>

On Sun, Aug 06, 2023 at 05:20:54PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> When there's no irq(this can be due to various reasons, for example,
> no irq from HW support, or we just want to use poll solution, and so
> on), falling back to poll is still better than no support at all.

Ouch, really?  Why not just fix the hardware instead?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] serial: 8250_dw: fall back to poll if there's no interrupt
  - From: Jisheng Zhang

References:
- [PATCH v2 0/2] serial: 8250_dw: fall back to poll if there's no interrupt
  - From: Jisheng Zhang

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: serial: snps-dw-apb-uart: make interrupt optional
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] serial: 8250_dw: fall back to poll if there's no interrupt
Previous by thread: [PATCH v2 2/2] serial: 8250_dw: fall back to poll if there's no interrupt
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] serial: 8250_dw: fall back to poll if there's no interrupt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux PPP] [Linux FS] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Linmodem] [Device Mapper] [Linux Kernel for ARM]