Re: [PATCH] tty: serial: fsl_lpuart: Fix possible integer overflow

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 18. 07. 23, 8:56, Sherry Sun wrote:
This patch addresses the following Coverity report, fix it by casting
sport->port.frame_time to type u64.

CID 32305660: Unintentional integer overflow (OVERFLOW_BEFORE_WIDEN)
Potentially overflowing expression sport->port.frame_time * 8U with type
unsigned int (32 bits, unsigned) is evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic,
and then used in a context that expects an expression of type u64 (64
bits, unsigned).

Fixes: cf9aa72d2f91 ("tty: serial: fsl_lpuart: optimize the timer based EOP logic")
Signed-off-by: Sherry Sun <sherry.sun@xxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c
index c1980ea52666..07b3b26732db 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c
@@ -1373,7 +1373,7 @@ static inline int lpuart_start_rx_dma(struct lpuart_port *sport)
sport->last_residue = 0;
  	sport->dma_rx_timeout = max(nsecs_to_jiffies(
-		sport->port.frame_time * DMA_RX_IDLE_CHARS), 1UL);
+		(u64)sport->port.frame_time * DMA_RX_IDLE_CHARS), 1UL);

Can you explain how that can overflow? In the worst case (1 start bit, 8 data bits, 2 stop bits, parity bit, address bit, 50 bauds), frame_time would contain:
13*1e9/50 = 260,000,000. (260 ms)

Then the multiplication above is:
260,000,000*8 = 2,080,000,000. (2 seconds)

which is still less than 2^32-1.

thanks,
--
js
suse labs




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux