On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 16:30:26 +0200
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 07/06/2023 16:05, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
> > From: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Some variants in this series of UART controllers have GPIO pins that
> > are shared between GPIO and modem control lines.
> >
> > The pin mux mode (GPIO or modem control lines) can be set for each
> > ports (channels) supported by the variant.
> >
> > This adds a property to the device tree to set the GPIO pin mux to
> > modem control lines on selected ports if needed.
> >
> > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 6.1.x
> > Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Lech Perczak <lech.perczak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > .../bindings/serial/nxp,sc16is7xx.txt | 46 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/nxp,sc16is7xx.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/nxp,sc16is7xx.txt
> > index 0fa8e3e43bf8..1a7e4bff0456 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/nxp,sc16is7xx.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/nxp,sc16is7xx.txt
> > @@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ Optional properties:
> > 1 = active low.
> > - irda-mode-ports: An array that lists the indices of the port that
> > should operate in IrDA mode.
> > +- nxp,modem-control-line-ports: An array that lists the indices of the port that
> > + should have shared GPIO lines configured as
> > + modem control lines.
> >
> > Example:
> > sc16is750: sc16is750@51 {
> > @@ -35,6 +38,26 @@ Example:
> > #gpio-cells = <2>;
> > };
> >
> > + sc16is752: sc16is752@53 {
>
> Since you keep sending new versions, fix the names. nNode names should
> be generic. See also explanation and list of examples in DT specification:
> https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation
Hi,
by the way, I do not "keep sending new versions" just for the fun of
it...
Even after reading your link, I cannot see what is wrong with that
name.
You are the first one since V1 to think it is inappropriate.
Please suggest what the name should be.
Hugo.
