* Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [230508 09:55]: > An unrelated comment to the patch itself, there seems to be somewhat > handwavy and possibly wrong calculation for the pm qos latency. First of > all, I think it would want something based on port->frame_time, and I'm > far from convinced that 64 is right as it matches FIFO size which doesn't > feel correct for a wakeup related time. Thanks for spotting it, good point. I'll take a look at that in a separate patch. Regards, Tony
