From: Daniel Starke <daniel.starke@xxxxxxxxxxx> There are multiple places in gsm_control_command and gsm_control_reply that derive the specific DLCI handle directly out of the DLCI table in gsm. Add a local variable which holds this handle and use it instead to improve code readability. Signed-off-by: Daniel Starke <daniel.starke@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/tty/n_gsm.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) v1 -> v2: Moved from patch 9 to 8 as suggested in the review. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/AS4PR10MB58953283D47928E265313660E0919@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ diff --git a/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c b/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c index ce06cbbe79af..bd6bddb185b9 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c +++ b/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c @@ -1450,15 +1450,16 @@ static int gsm_control_command(struct gsm_mux *gsm, int cmd, const u8 *data, int dlen) { struct gsm_msg *msg; + struct gsm_dlci *dlci = gsm->dlci[0]; - msg = gsm_data_alloc(gsm, 0, dlen + 2, gsm->dlci[0]->ftype); + msg = gsm_data_alloc(gsm, 0, dlen + 2, dlci->ftype); if (msg == NULL) return -ENOMEM; msg->data[0] = (cmd << 1) | CR | EA; /* Set C/R */ msg->data[1] = (dlen << 1) | EA; memcpy(msg->data + 2, data, dlen); - gsm_data_queue(gsm->dlci[0], msg); + gsm_data_queue(dlci, msg); return 0; } @@ -1477,14 +1478,15 @@ static void gsm_control_reply(struct gsm_mux *gsm, int cmd, const u8 *data, int dlen) { struct gsm_msg *msg; + struct gsm_dlci *dlci = gsm->dlci[0]; - msg = gsm_data_alloc(gsm, 0, dlen + 2, gsm->dlci[0]->ftype); + msg = gsm_data_alloc(gsm, 0, dlen + 2, dlci->ftype); if (msg == NULL) return; msg->data[0] = (cmd & 0xFE) << 1 | EA; /* Clear C/R */ msg->data[1] = (dlen << 1) | EA; memcpy(msg->data + 2, data, dlen); - gsm_data_queue(gsm->dlci[0], msg); + gsm_data_queue(dlci, msg); } /** -- 2.34.1
