On Fri, 17 Mar 2023, David Laight wrote:
> From: Ilpo Järvinen
> > Sent: 16 March 2023 13:25
> >
> > There's a potential race before THRE/TEMT deasserts when DMA Tx is
> > starting up (or the next batch of continuous Tx is being submitted).
> > This can lead to misdetecting Tx empty condition.
> >
> > It is entirely normal for THRE/TEMT to be set for some time after the
> > DMA Tx had been setup in serial8250_tx_dma(). As Tx side is definitely
> > not empty at that point, it seems incorrect for serial8250_tx_empty()
> > claim Tx is empty.
> >
> > Fix the race by also checking in serial8250_tx_empty() whether there's
> > DMA Tx active.
> >
> > Note: This fix only addresses in-kernel race mainly to make using
> > TCSADRAIN/FLUSH robust. Userspace can still cause other races but they
> > seem userspace concurrency control problems.
> >
> > Fixes: 9ee4b83e51f74 ("serial: 8250: Add support for dmaengine")
> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.h | 12 ++++++++++++
> > drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c | 7 ++++++-
> > 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.h b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.h
> ...
> > static inline int ns16550a_goto_highspeed(struct uart_8250_port *up)
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c
> > index fa43df05342b..4954c4f15fb2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c
> > @@ -2006,17 +2006,22 @@ static unsigned int serial8250_tx_empty(struct uart_port *port)
> > {
> > struct uart_8250_port *up = up_to_u8250p(port);
> > unsigned long flags;
> > + bool dma_tx_running;
> > u16 lsr;
> >
> > serial8250_rpm_get(up);
> >
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags);
> > lsr = serial_lsr_in(up);
> > + dma_tx_running = serial8250_tx_dma_running(up);
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->lock, flags);
> >
> > serial8250_rpm_put(up);
> >
> > - return uart_lsr_tx_empty(lsr) ? TIOCSER_TEMT : 0;
> > + if (uart_lsr_tx_empty(lsr) && !dma_tx_running)
> > + return TIOCSER_TEMT;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > }
>
> Since checking whether dma is active is fast but reading
> the lsr is slow it is probably better to generate the return
> value inside the lock and test for dma first.
> Something like:
> spin_lock()
> result = 0;
> if (!serial8250_tx_dma_running(up) &&
> uart_lsr_tx_empty(serial_lsr_in(up)))
> result = TIOCSER_TEMT;
> }
> spin_unlock()
> ...
> return result;
>
> David
Thanks, I'll change it to something along those lines.
--
i.
