* Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> [230309 12:23]: > On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 10:57:08AM +0200, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > + err = pm_runtime_get(port_dev); > > Is not sync API a deliberate choice? Do we need to comment on why is so? I don't think it can be sync version.. See where all __uart_start() may get called from. The pm_runtime_get() here is needed so the check for pm_runtime_active() won't be racy. Maybe we can now leave out the "start TX anyways" part though. Thanks for your other comments too, will fix up those for the next revision. Regards, Tony
