On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 03:45:01PM +0000, Tharunkumar.Pasumarthi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2022 1:55 PM ... > > > + case PCI_SUBDEVICE_ID_EFAR_PCI11414: > > > + irq_idx = idx; > > > + break; > > > > Try to make this entire switch-case more compact. It's possible. > > I am planning to use look-up table for this in-order to avoid computation > within switch case. Does this approach sound good? Maybe, it's you who decides, just show us the result and we will see. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
