On Mon, 7 Nov 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 01:07:04PM +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > > Here are a number of 8250 DMA related fixes. The last one seems the > > most serious problem able to corrupt the payload ordering. > > > > Ilpo Järvinen (4): > > serial: 8250: Fall back to non-DMA Rx if IIR_RDI occurs > > 8250_port? > > > serial: 8250_lpss: Configure DMA also w/o DMA filter > > serial: 8250_lpss: Use 16B DMA burst with Elkhart Lake > > serial: 8250: Flush DMA Rx on RLSI > > 8250_port? Why? To me this 8250_core/port split is still integral part of the same 8250 even if they're in the end technically loaded into different modules or the code is in a different file. There's even some trickery to access internals of the other part to workaround the circular module dependency logic that would otherwise prevent the split (like we learned not so long time ago with that setup_irq change). I can start to use 8250_port if you insist but it seems pointless 5 extra characters out from a resource that is scarse to begin with, IMHO (the summary line is not that long). -- i.
