Re: I/O page faults from 8250_mid PCIe UART after TIOCVHANGUP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 19 Sep 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 02:47:08PM +0300, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 07:27:45PM +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > Thanks for the fix!
> > 
> > > [...] I'm far from sure if it's the 
> > > best fix though as I don't fully understand what causes the faults during 
> > > the THRE tests because the port->irq is disabled by the THRE test block.
> > 
> > If the IRQ hasn't been set up yet, the UART will have zeroes in its MSI
> > address/data registers.  Disabling the IRQ at the interrupt controller
> > won't stop the UART from performing a DMA write to the address programmed
> > in its MSI address register (zero) when it wants to signal an interrupt.
> > 
> > (These UARTs (in Ice Lake-D) implement PCI 2.1 style MSI without masking
> > capability, so there is no way to mask the interrupt at the source PCI
> > function level, except disabling the MSI capability entirely, but that
> > would cause it to fall back to INTx# assertion, and the PCI specification
> > prohibits disabling the MSI capability as a way to mask a function's
> > interrupt service request.)
> 
> This sounds to me like a good part to be injected into commit message of
> the proposed fix.

I added my own wording already but I could adds of Lennert's far superior 
descriptions verbatim if he is OK with that?


-- 
 i.

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux