On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 10:24 AM Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 23. 06. 22, 10:11, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > * prom_putchar_wait() should be implemented using
> > read_poll_timeout_atomic(), incl. failure/timeout handling.
> >
> > Not sure since it is an early stage and scheduler might not work as
> > expected. Conversions to iopoll.h macros bitten us a few times already.
>
> Except _atomic does not use scheduler :).
Sorry for a bit misleading comment, but I chased it down, so this what
I had in mind when commenting:
be24c6a71ecf ("soc: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Don't use ktime for timeout in
write_tcs_reg_sync()")
(Yes, it's about _atomic variant)
Means we need to use those macros with care.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
