On 02. 06. 22, 10:35, Mychaela Falconia wrote:
Jiri Slaby wrote:
s@ttyS0@ttyS<x>@
[...]
sysfs_emit()? (Even if I know %d won't overflow PAGE_SIZE :P.)
Thanks for the feedback - saving it for v3 of my patch series.
Any comments, positive or negative, on the principal/philosophical
idea behind this proposed patch series?
Neutral. As long as you break no currently supported devices.
I've just noticed the double negative "!tty_port_nordy()" on both calls
of that function. I guess there was already a discussion about the
naming, but wouldn't it make more sense to dub it like tty_port_do_rtscts()?
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
