On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 02:13:35PM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > Il 23/05/22 14:10, Greg KH ha scritto: > > On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 12:17:06PM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > > > Il 10/05/22 17:29, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno ha scritto: > > > > Il 10/05/22 14:56, Mark Brown ha scritto: > > > > > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 02:46:28PM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry for missing this tag, and also I'm sorry for the noise. > > > > > > > > > > Hey, if nobody broke anything all this testing stuff wouldn't be worth > > > > > it! > > > > > > > > > > > > Haha! That's true :-) > > > > > > > > Thank you! > > > > > > > > > Hello Mark, Greg > > > > > > I've just noticed that v5.18 was released, but without this revert. > > > > What is "this revert"? > > > > "this revert" == "this commit", reverting > > 6f81fdded0d0 ("serial: 8250_mtk: Make sure to select the right FEATURE_SEL") > > > > Can you schedule this for backport on v5.18? > > > > I need more context here, sorry. > > > > As stated in the commit description, some MediaTek SoCs are incompatible with > this change, hence it's actually breaking late serial for some machines. Did I already apply this change to my tree? If so, once it hits Linus's tree we can backport it to 5.18.1. thanks, greg k-h