Re: [RFC PATCH] serial: Don't assume uart_ops .throttle is always set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2022-04-28 at 20:11 +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> uart_throttle() assumes that a driver provides a throttle function in
> uart_ops. But not all drivers do and there seems to nothing in
> serial_core that would set it either. Thus, check it before calling.

If the driver does not provide throttle function, it should not
set UPSTAT_AUTORTS nor UPSTAT_AUTOXOFF in port->status.

> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> index 6a8963caf954..18c9d46e0b85 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> @@ -697,7 +697,8 @@ static void uart_throttle(struct tty_struct *tty)
>  		mask |= UPSTAT_AUTORTS;
>  
>  	if (port->status & mask) {

This if condition is always false if driver did not set UPSTAT_AUTORTS
nor UPSTAT_AUTOXOFF in port->status.

> -		port->ops->throttle(port);
> +		if (port->ops->throttle)
> +			port->ops->throttle(port);
>  		mask &= ~port->status;
>  	}
> 

I think this patch is incorrect. The assumption is not ".throttle is
always set" but rather ".throttle is set when UPSTAT_AUTORTS or
UPSTAT_AUTOXOFF is set".

Best Regards,
Tomasz Mon




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux