[PATCH v6 06/12] serial: 8250: dw: Introduce an rx_timeout variable in the IRQ path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In a next change we are going to need the same Rx timeout condition as
we already have in the IRQ handling code. Let's just create a boolean to
clarify what this operation does before reusing it.

There is no functional change.

Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c
index b34edc88af3d..ef3f05c82ad6 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c
@@ -225,6 +225,7 @@ static int dw8250_handle_irq(struct uart_port *p)
 	struct uart_8250_port *up = up_to_u8250p(p);
 	struct dw8250_data *d = to_dw8250_data(p->private_data);
 	unsigned int iir = p->serial_in(p, UART_IIR);
+	bool rx_timeout = (iir & 0x3f) == UART_IIR_RX_TIMEOUT;
 	unsigned int status;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
@@ -238,7 +239,7 @@ static int dw8250_handle_irq(struct uart_port *p)
 	 * This problem has only been observed so far when not in DMA mode
 	 * so we limit the workaround only to non-DMA mode.
 	 */
-	if (!up->dma && ((iir & 0x3f) == UART_IIR_RX_TIMEOUT)) {
+	if (!up->dma && rx_timeout) {
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&p->lock, flags);
 		status = p->serial_in(p, UART_LSR);
 
-- 
2.27.0




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux