On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 4:47 PM Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > I fail to understand really why a piece of code to correct and improve > broken UART baud rate calculation has to be stuck in limbo for almost a > year. There is nothing wrong with this code and it has a proper change > description and my observation has been that actually broken code often > with half a sentence serving as justification gets accepted with no fuss > all the time. :( If you remove those 3 or so lines of the code (that are pushing old SPD_CUST hack) I would be happy to Ack your patches immediately. Otherwise it's up to maintainers, if they are fine on that. I think it's a step back advertising something that should have not existed from day 1. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
