Re: [PATCH 2/2] tty: Implement lookahead to process XON/XOFF timely

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 01:24:37PM +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> When tty is not read from, XON/XOFF may get stuck into an
> intermediate buffer. As those characters are there to do software
> flow-control, it is not very useful. In the case where neither end
> reads from ttys, the receiving ends might not be able receive the
> XOFF characters and just keep sending more data to the opposite
> direction. This problem is almost guaranteed to occur with DMA
> which sends data in large chunks.
> 
> If TTY is slow to process characters, that is, eats less than given
> amount in receive_buf, invoke lookahead for the rest of the chars
> to process potential XON/XOFF characters.
> 
> The guards necessary for ensuring the XON/XOFF character are
> processed only once were added by the previous patch. All this patch
> needs to do on that front is to pass the lookahead count (that can
> now be non-zero) into port->client_ops->receive_buf().

...

> +static bool __n_tty_receive_char_special(struct tty_struct *tty, unsigned char c,
> +					 bool lookahead_done)
> +{
> +	if (!I_IXON(tty))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (c == START_CHAR(tty)) {
> +		if (!lookahead_done) {
> +			start_tty(tty);
> +			process_echoes(tty);
> +		}
> +		return true;
> +	}
> +	if (c == STOP_CHAR(tty)) {
> +		if (!lookahead_done)
> +			stop_tty(tty);
> +		return true;
> +	}
> +	return false;
> +}

Looking into this I would first make a preparatory patch that splits out
current code into something like

static bool __n_tty_receive_char_special_no_lookahead(struct tty_struct *tty, unsigned char c)
{
	...current code...
}

Then in the patch 1 you add

static bool __n_tty_receive_char_special_lookahead(struct tty_struct *tty, unsigned char c)
{
	...
}

static bool __n_tty_receive_char_special(struct tty_struct *tty, unsigned char c,
					 bool lookahead_done)
{
	if (!I_IXON(tty))
		return false;

	if (lookahead_done)
		return _lookahead();

	return _no_lookahead();
}

?

...

/*
 * Also start multi-line comments with
 * capital letter and finish with
 * grammar period.
 */

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux