Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: serial: pl011: Add 'arm,xlnx-uart'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 5:59 AM Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhraj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> <snip>
> > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/pl011.yaml
> > > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/pl011.yaml
> > > > > index 5ea00f8a283d..6c73923dd15e 100644
> > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/pl011.yaml
> > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/pl011.yaml
> > > > > @@ -24,9 +24,13 @@ select:
> > > > >
> > > > >  properties:
> > > > >    compatible:
> > > > > -    items:
> > > > > -      - const: arm,pl011
> > > > > -      - const: arm,primecell
> > > > > +    oneOf:
> > > > > +      - items:
> > > > > +          - const: arm,pl011
> > > > > +          - const: arm,primecell
> > > > > +      - items:
> > > > > +          - const: arm,pl011
> > > > > +          - const: arm,xlnx-uart # xilinx uart as platform device
> > > >
> > > > 'arm,primecell' means the block has ID registers. Are you saying
> > > > this implementation doesn't?
> > >
> > > The ID registers do not have any Xilinx specific identifiers.
> > > However there are differences  like 32-bit access.
> >
> > Hope that the current approach is fine with you.
>
> Could you please guide  how to go about it.

No, I don't know what the differences are in your h/w. You have ID
registers, but changed the IP and didn't change the ID registers? How
has the IP changed?

Rob



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux